Verbal dispute at circle k lodge with no injuries, Mesa AZ


A verbal argument occurred between a woman and a man near the Circle K Lodge at East Main Street. No weapons or injuries were reported. The man is a friend of the woman's tenant, and an expired vehicle is involved.
Audio|Source: Mesa Police Department Superstition Patrol District
02:41
Transcript:
00:00
One Charlie 56, any other Northeast unit to break for a 420[1] near Main St?
00:05
No, Charlie 5'6.
00:06
2,0.5.4.
00:08
I copy. It's going to be at near Main St at the Circle K Lodge.
00:13
R.P. and mail are in verbal.
00:14
No weapons or injuries.
00:15
R.P. says mail is unknown to her, but the male in the background is saying that she's lying.
00:16
I got it.
00:19
I definitely will try.
00:21
for that 420[1] mail.
00:23
The RP was asked twice to separate.
00:26
She refuses.
00:29
The mail is a friend of RP's tenant. I have their vehicle attached.
00:31
It's on a 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis that's blue.
00:32
And it's been expired since 2021.
00:35
No valid temp tags on it.
00:37
Info is coming in flow.
00:38
797 copy 102 please go ahead 382 32 32 32 32 32 to 17 to 17 458 updated code 4 at the windomere
00:40
7 to 17 458 at the windermere 22 24 24
00:59
One Charlie 46, which is in the event, 275, Lisa.
01:03
The 420[1], the male is a Hispanic male around 20, gray shirt, gray sweats, average height and weight, black hair, and a beard.
01:07
They think he left on older.
01:14
Do we have a unit number for the lodge?
01:16
Negative. She said, RP says she's on the backside of the property where the RVs are, but doesn't know.
01:19
She should be flagging y'all down.
01:24
That's why I'm not from the back side.
01:30
And in four.
01:31
Two Charlie 43-code four.
Police codes explained
The following codes appeared in the transcript and are explained below:
[1]
420: Drug or Narcotics Violation
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Near E Main St k/lodge, Mesa, AZ 85205
Correct
Incorrect