Person seen entering building during suspected burglary, Milwaukee County WI
BurglaryThe audio discusses a burglary investigation where a person was seen entering a building. Security cameras did not catch the person leaving. A witness reported someone pulling on doors shortly before police arrived.
Audio|Source: Milwaukee County Law Enforcement
04:34
Transcript:
10. If you could stay in contact with them and see if they can review it further ahead and just see if the camera ever catches anybody leaving. 10.4[1]. And a correction on that note. 3.43 time was the subject entering the thing. They never caught them leaving due to the four camera positioning. 10.4. Can you ask him where the subject? to enter the building from. It's bad for seven times. Right. Make sure his cameras would be coming from the north, it was obstructed, so through deduction. the subject entered either from the south or overhead because their camera came up. All ahead. One age, yes, the (number withheld), (number withheld), (number withheld), (number withheld), 1, (number withheld), (number withheld), (number withheld), 2,0, 31, 70. 7.4. 760.6-0-7-7-4. Do you recall from preguid burglaries, the exterior cameras were operational? They were not the previous burglary, they took the whole security camera system during the burglary. Temple? 166.10. 104. 60 traffic. $3,500 North Oakland with the (name withheld) v. Victor T-Tom 7196 Adam Victor Tom 7196 it's a gray Toyota one occupant Let's have four Three third seven ten a morning. Turn four. Ten to sixty two. Ten to sixty-two. What? There is a subject across the street in between where T-Mobile used to be. (name withheld). It's just for information. We have a home of subject to a street from Taco Bell says she saw a subject about 10 to 15 minutes prior to our arrival tugging on the doors. Have our... One name is her to dispatch. You could meet 10-8[2]. 10-4.
10. If you could stay in contact with them and see if they can review it further ahead and just see if the camera ever catches anybody leaving. 10.4[1]. And a correction on that note. 3.43 time was the subject entering the thing. They never caught them leaving due to the four camera positioning. 10.4. Can you ask him where the subject? to enter the building from. It's bad for seven times. Right. Make sure his cameras would be coming from the north, it was obstructed, so through deduction. the subject entered either from the south or overhead because their camera came up. All ahead. One age, yes, the (number withheld), (number withheld), (number withheld), (number withheld), 1, (number withheld), (number withheld), (number withheld), 2,0, 31, 70. 7.4. 760.6-0-7-7-4. Do you recall from preguid burglaries, the exterior cameras were operational? They were not the previous burglary, they took the whole security camera system during the burglary. Temple? 166.10. 104. 60 traffic. $3,500 North Oakland with the (name withheld) v. Victor T-Tom 7196 Adam Victor Tom 7196 it's a gray Toyota one occupant Let's have four Three third seven ten a morning. Turn four. Ten to sixty two. Ten to sixty-two. What? There is a subject across the street in between where T-Mobile used to be. (name withheld). It's just for information. We have a home of subject to a street from Taco Bell says she saw a subject about 10 to 15 minutes prior to our arrival tugging on the doors. Have our... One name is her to dispatch. You could meet 10-8[2]. 10-4.
Police codes explained
The following codes appeared in the transcript and are explained below:
[1]
10.4: Acknowledgement/Repeat
[2]
10-8: In Service
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
N Oakland Ave, Wisconsin
Correct
Incorrect
