Suspicious transaction reported at local Walgreens 

Transcript:
One, two, seven, one or two. Good. Can they see why that there's another transaction type according to our general or not? No, they're saying that they're trying to track it as an airpot in the wallet, however, it has a refresh in an hour, and that's why they hear it at least. I'm checking the bathroom at least right now. 140, copy one. Go ahead. Class of (name withheld), Common, first of (name withheld), (name withheld), (name withheld), Nora, Little J. John, 10, 3 of 06, 103 of 06. 103 of 06. No vote. 1.147. Good. He's valid, clear. No highlights. Oh, see. 10.4. 127, copy 2. Ben. Best name of Clifford, first name of Raymond with middle in Nora. You'll be of 615, 1942, 615, 1942. Go ahead. Best name is Boy Robert Ida, David, George, Edward, Mary, Adam, Nora, the first name is Teresa. Tom Henry, Edward, Robert, Edward, Sam, Adam, with Middle Ced Charles. Dubey of 10-2, 1965. 10-2 of 1965. Never. 127, 140. Go ahead. Do they actually see a photo of this person, or is that just what Walgreens told them? The walking is told. That's why I'm looking for myself and clarify. 10-4. And 127, he's a complaint number. This is 1765-1765. I have it listed as a suspicious circumstance. I feel like it labeled death or deceptive. I'm sorry, so the caller is popping me as well. What do you request? It's currently labeled as a suspicious circumstance. Do you want it for deceptive or theft? Deceptive. Deceptive. Stop far. One. What's what you're watching? Good. If you give you any indication that he went to waterings before that, if you could get a picture on most of the water in the stock for the man.

Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.