Stolen red Jeep Liberty reported near Old St. James Rd, Pulaski County MO


Police are searching for a bright red 2005 Jeep Liberty reported stolen near Old St. James Road in Pulaski County. The vehicle was taken by a male suspect and last seen heading eastbound. Officers are attempting to intercept the vehicle.
Audio|Source: Pulaski County Public Safety
02:39
Transcript:
00:00
Go ahead, uh, storing at the 189.
00:03
The possible stolen with Jeep Liberty coming down on old St.
00:06
James Road, Lord. If you're in the 189 area.
00:11
Okay, well, I'm just passing the internship now.
00:14
Each now, I'll keep that out for it.
00:17
City just had eyes on it, going down Old Tank James.
00:20
I'm going to set up here,
00:22
get a chance to get behind it.
00:24
I can be ready for spikes.
00:27
Simple.
00:33
135, Ross, you generated a call on that.
00:35
Go ahead and attach me as well.
00:36
Just getting into the county.
00:40
Simple.
00:48
379 a lot of plenty for you what they'd be looking for? Last thing you found from the 189, bright red 2005, Jeep Liberty,
01:05
pairing Zeezeeberidgee George, 0, Union 2, T.
01:08
Tom,
01:11
and a white male stole it.
01:20
How long ago was it eastbound from the 189? That's up.
01:23
One night, you want that? One clerk.
01:35
That information that would be used to be useful.
01:44
12553-0.
01:49
1253?
01:50
Can't get a CFS[1] number for spreading the roadway.
01:54
I'm on the highway D.
01:56
Just east of the Pulaski County line.
02:05
Here.
02:13
He's bound from late 9 less than 5 minutes ago.
02:18
Triple.
02:27
You're wrong about the 195 now.
02:30
He's probably be ahead of me.
02:36
I've been footing here.
02:38
He probably took you out of road.
Police codes explained
The following codes appeared in the transcript and are explained below:
[1]
CFS: Call(s) for Service
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Pulaski County, MO
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect