Argument over property leads to welfare check in NC
Family OffenseA man and his girlfriend had an argument about belongings. Although she was initially unwilling to return his items, she later agreed. The situation became tense enough that a welfare check was conducted, even though the man said he no longer needed police assistance.
Audio|Source: Rutherford County Sheriff, Fire and EMS
01:3
Transcript:
00:00Coming back upstairs the mission.00:03Virginia relevant.00:05Many 1510, 411.00:07Mission 5 is an out.00:09Took a call reference to a hospital 1098, 615 rope or loop road.00:13Callers and his girlfriend was refusing to give him some property back.00:17They could leave.00:20We started to ask subject questions.00:24She did start to cooperate.00:27Stand by.00:29Copy that five.00:34The mail did advise he no longer needed an officer, however, they were arguing.00:39You hear discretionary, you may want to give him a 1021.00:43Mission 5, your patient's going to be going to G309, G309.00:51Here are four.00:53Baker 2, Central.00:56Baker 2.00:57I'll spoke with the O.T.00:59They advised they would call back once they got out there or if they needed.
00:00
Coming back upstairs the mission.
00:03
Virginia relevant.
00:05
Many 1510, 411.
00:07
Mission 5 is an out.
00:09
Took a call reference to a hospital 1098, 615 rope or loop road.
00:13
Callers and his girlfriend was refusing to give him some property back.
00:17
They could leave.
00:20
We started to ask subject questions.
00:24
She did start to cooperate.
00:27
Stand by.
00:29
Copy that five.
00:34
The mail did advise he no longer needed an officer, however, they were arguing.
00:39
You hear discretionary, you may want to give him a 1021.
00:43
Mission 5, your patient's going to be going to G309, G309.
00:51
Here are four.
00:53
Baker 2, Central.
00:56
Baker 2.
00:57
I'll spoke with the O.T.
00:59
They advised they would call back once they got out there or if they needed.
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Rutherford County, NC
Correct
Incorrect
