Confusion over trespass order at local stores


Police responded to a situation involving confusion about a trespass order related to a protected party. They clarified that the incident pertains to Target, not Walmart.
Audio|Source: Spokane County Sheriff and Fire, Spokane City Police / Fire - Digital
01:43
Transcript:
371 still can. 3171. The vehicle has been waived, it's legally parked at the Circle K. I pulled our report number and I'll be en route, Airway Highs P. Drivers in log. 74 also. Good. You might be under lots of Bonner as well, Boyo Ocean or Edward Robert. Copy. There you got it. Two zero one, Lexington. Number five one. Two spot of zero that protected on a served order with the (name withheld) in local trespass. Forever from all Walmart. Do you want to lose that trespass between? February is this year? One's right. Biglow and Palmer Charles Lincoln Lincoln 1354 Boulevardary, 1922. Disregard the trespass penit appears that was entered incorrectly and should be from Target, not Walmart.
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Spokane, WA
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect