Fire alarm at commercial building in danville, Danville IL
Fire & ArsonA commercial fire alarm was reported at a three-story masonry building near North Hazel Street in Danville. Upon arrival, no fire was visible. Firefighters used a Knox box key to check the building and determined that one engine could handle the situation while others returned to service.
Audio|Source: Vermilion County, Rossville, Hoopeston and Danville Fire Departments
01:55
Transcript:
00:00
One. Engine 3, trim all the mobile fan, first alarm for a partial fire alarm.
00:08
201 North Hazel Street, active commercial fire alarm, showing zone, 482, general fire, and engine one, engine three.
00:17
Check 11 in the Old Cran, first alarm, fire alarm, 2.1.R.A.F.
00:20
Hazel,
00:21
actually, commercial fire alarm, showing zone, 482, general fire.
00:24
Cross, Mr. Harrison and Madison.
00:28
Mr. Harrison. Okay.
00:35
The three, round.
00:38
May 2 will be clear for the painter and service,
00:50
not easy to be able to be around to the route to the council.
00:57
Senator.
01:01
Stay essential one's off a three-story masonry building.
01:05
We've got nothing shown.
01:06
We'll be off using the Knox box key.
01:07
Okay,
01:10
prior, copy, three, Stury, May, String, Building, nothing shining.
01:13
He's in the last block.
01:15
This is the last block.
01:20
Double-connect from Jamal.
01:30
Talk to a workaround team, they believe, who's going to go to the search and figure it out? Engine 1 should be able to handle.
01:39
I understood that engine one can handle.
01:42
Like, base firm, Mobile Command, Engine One can handle a call.
01:46
We're going to turn all our units of service.
01:48
Web Command is back on service.
01:52
Open. Oh, but instead of hiring how the Engine One Command can't.
01:54
Service again.
Disclaimer:
This transcript was automatically generated and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
N Hazel St, Danville, IL 61832
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect
